
So, the questions are going to be based around your views, about misinformation your experiences with the tool. And about mission information. Oh, so the first question about your views on misinformation is what might be the effects of missing information. What do you think might be the effect of missing information?

Can be of anything I see. It can lead to some matchstens incidents, say any kind of so, accidents and incident. So, any specific kind that you're? It can cover. I don't know it's in specific the in general generally, the all the missing information will lead to anything negative writing, okay?

None of them is information. Will go on a lead in a right way. Okay. So just being negative engineered any health. If it's if it's missing information that it's not good for us. Yeah. Up. Do you all have anything hard and yeah, people will have wrong opinions about things and that's Good.

Here. It's wrong openings. And anything else it might think might be the effect of machine information. It could lead to like, Of the way people perceive. Fears about certain things in life. Things that have. Generated negative opinion. And, Could actually. Enhance those affairs such as like newspapers that are A highlighting like or headlining stories about.

And it's terrorism sort of incidents. Where, People might jump on the bound wagon and say it's it's the Islamicists who have Caused this. And therefore, Of people might. Just think you know about immigrations immigrants in the country. There's too many other they're stating our jobs. Now they're causing bombs and kidding people in our country.

And, Yeah, so it, it can Enhanced people's fears and it's securities about the unknown. So amplifying someone's thoughts based on something being misinformation. Um, anything else to add on this? Okay, so moving on to the next question. It's About your experiences with misinformation. So, how do you check the accuracy of information?

And so, if you come across something, how do you Find out more than one source to find out, and if they all agree about the same thing, then I think it would be right. And which I checked with this in previous informations, given by the sources, whether those into previous passed, informations for true or not, right?

And then go through those things. And so the history of a specific doctors, Okay. Um, anything into my path. He just made for the same source so you would look at what else can put. Yes. Lovely. I was outside see if it's kind of respectable source like a university saying things or maybe just somebody posted our Facebook.

Of course I would feel believe more reputable alsoars So, Do you have anything like that? Yeah, I've read to my questionnaire about Checking the I'm checking on reliable. Sources. I got openizational so places that such as the government website or NHS, And I am kind of familiar. With the main.

A bodies of governance and this country. Also, go to the Nottingham City Council website. For any information. And, you know, when it was covid and Government. Would say, you know, this is where you can go to get your jobs, you know and This is the and then it'll be a link to the NHS website to get all that information.

Yeah. So or you're saying that there are specific sources which you trust more. Yeah. Oh, so that that actually brings us to the next question. So are there any specific sources that you could name? I mean, I know you've said a few of them. But do you have any others that you would like to have to this?

Trustable sources inside. I don't trust the newspaper agencies, which are there any specific ones that like We can take it. Take a baby. See? Guardian. Times times now cut.

Um, day, it will reliable Government sources with movement website, all right. I don't believe it. Actually anyone. Oh, Always suspicious. Okay. Yeah. Also, do you think there is a specific kind of information which is more prone to being misinformation? Oh, i think things like like COVID that could make everybody boring and panic.

I think those are Most tense. Oh, Of course, So things that can cause people to Yeah, people panic. Okay, thanks. Yeah, we can take the today's scenario at nodding MCP synthetic. It's three murdest happened today. Me each news itemies will come make it. They won't stories. Someone says the terrorist attack.

Someone says it's a what? It's some freaks attack, Actually, nobody knows who killed them. Who did what? But they started free framing. This story is now we said That may be the so, So in this context, what you say, crime is something that It attempt we wouldn't say anything I if I'm not wrong.

Even. They also don't know whether they go got the right person or not. Yeah, They're already framing it. Yeah they already flaming that story is already there. Yeah yeah. So I just put here that different sources have different frames and biases that before Before knowing about one knowing yes before Facts are clear.

Up here. It's great to bake on Twitter and they're lit and then linking so you're right thinking certain news articles and then their debating you know, the ethnic minority, you know, are they? They're white, are they Asia? And is it Islamic in? It's it, you're right straight away and they're linking different use sources, you know, and they started searching for the grounds for themselves.

You create this story. Absolutely To sit there agenda again. Yeah, yeah. Like this one. I don't believe anyone. Always suspicious. It's always this picture. I think that's bad. Yeah. So because I put these ones as the ones that we're initially mentioned, is being good, but then maybe for some people, there were gonna question even within the ones that are Of deem to be good.

Maybe they're not as trustworthy. I mean I've had issues with With some of these. Funny occasion. That's the thing is, the new has to be compared compared with the same news as to be comforted with the different sources So we can get to know about the genuinity of the Most.

So this again, this is a checking that multiple sources. Yeah, you're looking to that that comes up strong review, do that as well doing the problems. I'm playing. It's anything else that we want to actually get this if not? I can want different next question. Oh, so the next question is about the viewers of the tool you just used.

So, the first question there is, what did you find easy or difficult about the tool? Was it easy? Yes. Yeah. Easy to use. Did you find all? Was it easy? Within the thing, is it easy to use? But it's the mattress is what we are using the tool for that's a little bit completely better, not check the man.

It's gone. Please honestly. And the thing is and actually I still have I don't have a clear context of the tool, Can you explain me once what the tool is for? So I think this anyone want to take this So as a moment, the total is signed for research so that You know, so people put things on Twitter, for example, you're sharing your public team, right?

So in the parts of these are just said, well that's probably shared So, and we're able to pass it. We're allowed to do that. But what we're saying is people put it out. For Twitter but they didn't give us permissions specifically to take that and research it. So we want to we want to give people the option to Say yes, through allowed to look at a stuff.

Um but we don't want to see everything. We just want to see the snippets that are really useful to us. So we've designed this talk for research first and foremost, so that people can have a look, see what they find and then they can agree. Yes or no. Share it to.

If you are a split in a study you could you could do the thing and you could say actually I don't forget that you don't have to do and that's the choice so that what we're hoping that a few years time when we've developed it and we've used all your suggestions and things to improve it, people will be able to put it on their own browsers and just use it for a poem so they can go actually.

Need to maybe look into that a bit better for a bit more before I I believe it be true. So that's what I think eventually but it will be a few years and the things I find hard in the tool is I couldn't get relate, the parameters of the tools which should already present, do the function of the purpose of the tool.

Okay? Actually I read I read before I accessed that it's for the genuine for in fact check will for the news but the parameters in the tool, doesn't designated to find our fire, checking the facts and of the news. It's all I looks like a checking the grammatical things and those kind of it feels like it's taking like comparative things, superlative things, and those kind of stuffs, if you looks like it's for a research, kind of research document, it's still the kind of paraphrasing on confiding the current grammarune it's in a no not the parts I could I I couldn't found how to find the new system genuine or not.

Okay. So basically correl for relating between the two. Yeah. Yes. Yeah, yeah. School. That it was giving it was telling you whether it was real or not, No, it gives you. Those, it breaks it down but then doesn't give you that kind of like this path because it doesn't, it doesn't tell you get.

So you give up Okay. Well you know what it just to be I don't know if we we were clear all of those were definitely. This is information and not of them were real, okay? In something, for some newsesy in it shows different kinds. Of course, I don't even know what this, Why this course is it.

For All I need is a yes or no, whether it's actually one factual, That's what, that's what I mean. If you just want to be overview, just one one thing. So yes, no maybe. Oh, yeah. Just wanted to come up as a proper or would you like it to show on the little icon in the top?

Yeah, maybe just like a small percentage circle will be enough for me. Yeah it may be we can show the personage of factual about the what okay that could be more interactable with just one score just one. Yeah score is in this more sufficient. I think. Would make grammar and Republican new releases.

Yeah. Okay. I'm not. You're quite like the way it was analysed or though the markers was were It was quite hard to understand and you know like superactive and Polarity and no, it's not really. So you need to explain that a bit more rather than just headline that section and then give examples of those things.

Feet explanation to come, you know, with like a question mark button, next to each thing, so you can get a little take all. Would you like, actually everything to be on one place on one page? You know, where you can look up a glossary of time. Yeah, yeah. Maybe a glossary or So it needs to be a bit more sort of user friendly, so then you're not reading Up.

And i know it's an it's prototype. You're not you know you're just so working it out. Decisions based on what you want it. Yeah but yeah. That's really helpful. Thank you. Good to the lay person who's not a Academically sort of used to reading. Analysing stuff like this. It's going to be hard for them to extrapolate.

What is meant to be about? I mean, I'm not that academic myself, but I found like a bit of struggle, but that I think in this room, They understand what the linguistic terms mean now but they didn't stop it. Hmm, and polarity isn't something, I don't know. I mean, it's, you get something like I had to learn as part of this.

I say, right? This is these aren't accessible term. No, we totally understand. Yeah, yeah, no time couldn't find anything related to the author of the content. Yeah, i'll be interesting to see. Well, it, where the source was in the camparitative things in the temporary to table. So you are mentioning that the comparative sentence work, But then it do things.

Whether, but what I expected in the comparative diabetes, we comparing this same news which published in some another website on links are agencies. Put that compared with them of, with the numbers and this is actual data in the sense That would be more helpful tool. Yes. Maybe not sort of like put that on the actual content page but later, so once we've done our questionnaires, otherwise it would be buyers.

You know, and being influenced by our decision on whether Sleep. Actually, believe it or not. You know. Yeah, yeah, that's true. We took out the We made it as basic as we could be, took out the authors because some of them were from quite well-known. Herselfness Information. Yes, I think about Um yes yeah.

You're right In real life. What you would have you you're just being a normal website at the BBC website for something so yeah, great, thank you, sorry. See that I should know. That's all right. That's it was very interesting, kind of conversation then. So anything else to add with what you found easier?

Difficult about the tool. So, Okay it's that's everything, right percentages, those like 0 points. Something, I don't thinking That's a really haven't much relevance, you know. It's doesn't actually great. By a concrete answer for me. Because you don't Because I don't know, you know, the way it's analysed and It doesn't make sense to me.

So its I don't know whether it's useful or not, you know. To. Here. I think that's very fair. Very good. It's funny asked the question. Do you who do you think is sort of most targeted? So that was the most hardened by people who spread this information, or who do you think is most common rubble was susceptible to miss information?

Just think we should be sort of angry, our efforts towards I was saying to repeat her about the marginalised communities. Of those who are socially I stayated and with the prevalence of technology, assisted. It's devices that we're also rely on. I'm not become addicted to. And I think it just Increases there.

Reliance. On on miso on, on data that they see on their phones. It's like a digital literacy issue. Really, if you're if you're, you can use the internet that you're not. A soak it up to spotting. You know where something is potentially? Problematic you. Yeah, you've got like People who are suffering with their mental health and You know, with the onset of like covid and the after effects of people on people's lives where we've all had to work from home or or not work.

And so we're become very Insider in the way we think, and we've kind of become more dependant on The sources that we find for ourselves went and, and it's our way of communicating with others. Through the internet. Or on social media. Close double wire me though. When isolated and relying on.

Technology to mediate everything. And then you've got that kind of the face stuff can come through and there's no one to balance it off and check the games. Yeah. That's good. It's much easily. I put my last communities and relying on phones for info. Put them together and then you come into proper bubble.

I think like people that have come from another country to our country, they're not always going to Be able to access the news because it's not in their own language. And so, there's that. Barrier for them in not knowing what they believe in. And so they'll probably trust what they hear on their great vine.

And in their own language. Quickly. One day, this will work in multiple activities. Here, That's a challenge. I mean, we're in a diverse city. Absolutely with many, many languages languages. Yeah. Video here. Very, very fortunate but it does come with its own problems. You know, for those people, you And those people are probably talking to you.

See that lot in America as well. Um, spring voters and things. They know the demographics. They are talking, It's very effective. It's like over here with white workless. So fun. Men. And Particularly men, you know, where they Have where they've put a sense of identity that is no longer there's anymore, and it's overtaken by the insel movement and That's quite worrying because it's subjecting, our relationships were around, sort of male members of our families.

And so I worry for them, And their future relationships with women. And You know everything else I can't you know it's just what ring. Yeah. Yeah. Like, Quite agreement. That

He's wearing the inside thing is particularly interesting, actually. Hmm. So, If you are interested there is a there's some quite a lot going on in linguistics about this. Well, it's actually a message if you want to know if I can payment Duchess of someone. Oh yeah, it's it's plenty of research in there in that field now.

Yeah. Of you trying to catch the early before. For their own, it's a community for that. You know, if you feel like you don't care, It gives you communities to fit into. Yeah I need to community, right? Like with a judgmentation just yeah. And also I talking about transideology and I mean, I know that's a hot topic and this it can be to do for For some people who may not be able to share their views before fear of being ostracised and being anti-trans.

And And, and it's not. The subject isn't going to go anywhere unless we talk about it, you know, and that's yeah, but but it's it's kind of influenced a lot of people. Across the board. That's the reason information. Yeah, yeah. Yeah right. Statistics, and Suicides, and mental health and And it seems like to what you were saying earlier about the fears of the unknown and things.

It's a, it's a perfect storm, it's no. Hmm. Yeah. It feels like those are the underlying that's the undercurrency is nice fear and Worries about things, you don't understand and So I guess in in a way that's your vulnerable, That's sort of a good world's down too, isn't it?

The two monorable parties and anyone who's. And it just no enough about the topic. Well, such an interesting. Yeah, because society is like become very You know, polarising in ways in what we think of you know what crime is and how to prevent that and think about your own personal safety and We can easily sort of grab rub onto the news about.

You know, people getting killed in this city and it's done by a non-. White person. And they're an immigrants and, you know, and that's going to Of course, waves of distrust. Yeah, as we promotion. Yeah.

Yeah. Always try to read it. Just came up here. Snow notes. The evening post is the worst. I hate that. I hate that. Nice. Yeah, they're not him. Oh, it's pretty right-wing and then you there's like a comment section. And that's linked to an news art. Each newsletter. Article, most of its links other to other times.

It's not I think because they've earned it as a sensitive subject so that could close comments on it. Yeah, they close. It said because they've You know, it could incite racial. A racist opinions and things. Yeah. But it, but you see though, he's putting me officers out but no, but you still see but there are some articles that do Ghana racist opinions that are printed on their website.

So that's why it's such a You know, dangerous. A new source that people go to, you know, the internet is like a dangerous place to go, isn't it? Yeah, but it can incite you to say something because it's it's stirred something within you for you, to want to comment.

Yeah, because you feel that you believe in something and you want to portray that and and have it in print, And I think that's quite important for some people who want to have their say but they're not heard. So this is their perfect platform to say as they wish with without Been known.

And they, and that's like, potentially I think it's been known. So people to actually say exactly what they're fear without, any sort of barriers those no holds bar to they'll Yeah, and that's more dangerous than actually doing it in persons in person because they'll for probably filter their information there.

Of their thoughts before they speak out to a real knife person. With and in golden to others, when they read that, actually now I I'm free to voice those opinions. We're actually those opinions would be kept to behind me. I think. Really think that they're not. I had some terrible things on the train left.

Did you had to? I had to say, Did you get any flag? I've never in my, but did it was it positive in the no? Well, at least you got his feedback. Are other moment for Lauren, Bolden and I think a lot of it is to do with You know, being able to voice your opinions like you say.

And I do think So the what you've seen, I guess, the publication itself isn't being responsible, Wow. Taking their closing down the comment sections, but then there's not. But they don't do it for every article. No, but they don't do it for every article, it's just the articles. Still get published and up, comments are still allowed.

But that it's not, there's no consistency as to which articles are Are allowed to comment or not. So so if you go to the investigation of the Nelson say, Close the comments down. On, i didn't, i don't know. Well, If I make a formal complaint, I wonder if how far it will get Treated, whether it'll be Treaty seriously or below big note, the probably just see me as one person that's complained out of many other comments that have gay garnered for that piece and then, they'll probably ignore me.

Yeah, because it's not really a newspaper site. For the most open minded is. It's very right wing, the way it's red. Do you think a tall like this coot? Improve industries. Yeah. Because they It's rolled out. So someone said something this morning's what I'm thinking. So more said it's been this morning about what if you were able to see a number that said to live old 1500 articles have been checked from this source and 70% of them were found to contain potentially because leading like which Would that encourage the editors of people who have putting that news out to actually improve their score?

And exactly that we can display to do. I don't, it's a bit ambitious, but yeah. Like pressure. Yeah. Feel precious to do something related to you in college. Well, it all depends on here their leadership is, you know, do they actually carry because, you know, there are in competition, aren't they?

You know, against all the big giants. So local papers are Dwindling, you know, and it's only the old stall will readerships that remain loyal to them. And because if you ask any young person to read the local news of probably say, no, I'll get my local news from from social media.

And that's never verified and researched, and You know, that's like a The world west of information. That's very young, that's nice. Okay. Yeah. I'm really interesting. I'm the only two which we have used is very famous thing that news using this sentences and how is the the frame the structure like So it doesn't say yes this is most information or know that it's not or your totally safe.

It says It's contains language that we know is more common. In this information so you should be careful. But what you read here, you need to take this with a venture soft or it could take with pretty sure that the language is used pretty genuine but either way you should always be here.

I feel guards. Yeah. But anyhow, it's working on the working basics on the in languages, which they formed on the. Yeah. So people have gathered huge data sets of misinformation and we're able to look at the statistics, so we'll be able to let them grammar. The cleanse of words that they use.

Um, And, What if the misinformation was print by a proper person, who can actually frame the perfect sentences for the next day, that would be the people. But they don't, A lot of times they don't snow Yes, there is a possibility that they would learn right to it and essential way.

That's even more persuasive. Seems more factual On those cases, how will you valuate the news to the content? We have to another checking. Yeah, yeah, that would go through one of those organisations. So you really does feel to look at the words, you'd have to look at the facts very high.

Yeah, yeah. So it changes the differential. Yeah, which people do I mean, and they do, but it's, it's time consuming, they can't, they can only take a couple of Things a day. But one fact chequer, they could probably do two articles of the day. If they're lucky. You know, that there is so much information.

We want to do is go Oh, this can do it quite quickly to a lot of data. It's not going to be perfect, but it could help me to talk about how but we, yeah, it's not effecting, which is between Nothing told that most of the places in the, you cannot have japanese shockingly.

I was told and sailing male does. Oh, I know, Wow, I know. And I think they're good. Sleeping soothing Sometimes other than yeah the Germans to actually, you know, he puts things into the BBC. Little service, you put things in different. Papers. And he said to me that dailymail at the time like not a long ago, actually is the only one that had a fact.

Checking department, how many people died But then a tourists for for misleading and their stories and have having like liable cases against them. Yeah. So they ignore the fact checking team Maybe they on the bait on the brink of them like being labelled as the paper that not to be trusted and for for fetching stories.

Made a decision to employ a fact that yeah, probably Since that any guy links by the government for the news channels? Oh, for the newspapers, I'm sure that there are some guidelines for spreading the mission for. Yeah. Yeah, I mean, because we've got laws against, There's a press standards.

Yeah, the press standards live also one for you for written as libel and yes, it's liable, isn't it? When it's written slander if it's spoken. So, you know, if they do put out knowingly, false information. They always try and find a way to sell at the time. We thought it was true but if they knowing you put out false information then, yeah, they can be sued and they have been sued papers to get sued by people.

And then the next publisher attraction, which is that was a tiny and on the hundreds of each other big headline with a line, and then the attraction. Now, that really small at the back of people that, yes, and that's a judge forces that to make actually. Yeah. And as a judge forces, that sometimes you can get very rare.

Alive, which I think that should always be because that's not pickles lives. Get destroyed and And it's only those that I've got lots of money that can take them to call to. So are lots of people, you know, About the average person on the street, won't be able to do that.

So they can get away same what they want, you know, situations, but that's it. Mmm, I'm so far, the fact, checking the Programs, may runs on the Oh, To testify the person, right? Well, why don't you use the multiple sources, like multiple newspaper agencies? Multiple government agencies, kind of things to checking the fact of the news?

Because we're not fracturing so we're not fracture. Checking Um, it could be something that we would want to use alongside in the future. But for now, this was specifically looking at the words, the language, the finding those markers that have been studied and found to be, if there's more, is that, if there's more of them in the text, it's likely not to be.

So that's the way we're going. Um, but in the future, I can only imagine that you would have a even have a multi-pronged approach, right? So, you would look at the language being used and you will have fact chequers as well. And I again, AI is going to start doing a number of these jobs for us.

I can only imagine because like I said, well I ever said one person two articles a day you just can't get through it. So you are going to have to train Tools to be able to help you to make the most useful about. Because it just, they're just answering of humans to deal with the proliferation of data level, that's coming out in the amount of Mississippi.

We're just why it's taking over us. It's easier to spread than it is to containing control. Yeah. It makes money if you you're getting clicks. So sensation, it makes money sensation was funny here. Where we are then information. Is it here? Oh, so I think. So let's do concerts we can ask what the concerns have told.

I yes So, when you're using the tool, There's anything about using the tool that worries you have already written one thing down. So it's like the meaning of some of the terms, right? Yeah. Like that's an example of one. So yeah, actually knowing what what it's measuring. Could be a worry.

I agree. And anything else that worries? You about the tool concerns you when you're using it. Full would make it better. I didn't really like how it says, oh, it could be mister information, only because somebody said something like, I felt fine. I think it should be more like, oh, that's subjective of opinion.

Not A potential misinformation I think there is deep. Okay, so yeah, there's a subtle team. Between.

Some more points. He can, you know, like language is very subjective and the way these articles are written, Then, you know, some of it is very sort of Non-journalistic type of writing. It's almost like, Of sensationalist attention grabbing. You know, pieces that some of its not very grammatical. It's there's no link.

You know to what was said before. And, No, no. And some of them worth were like not following some of the weapons newspapers but some of them, you were quite clearly not. But those wants, those ones are quite, they've really sensationalize that the pig baby picked up on social media, shared thousands, and thousands of times.

Those of the ones that actually, you can really engage with. And those are the ones that can get more to be coming. It doesn't really matter. There's no legendary related. Whether people believe is a big baby or not, But what if it was about something really serious that could call someone actually to go out and Like, It's just something like that and it had come from the same source and where people's attention.

Okay, yeah you're you're right some of the world were probably expected. Yeah, but it's but it feeds into the way we speak, you know, in normal data-day language. And rather than sort of when I'm not a It doesn't how to write and say these things, but Colloquial language is every day, speak.

And that newspaper language dependant on the newspaper in the audience. It's meantful. So like misinformation sources. It, I think try and gauge there or audience. To, to the way. Of the written content. It's for them to be able to relate to So it's relatable language. Yeah. Really important point, You know, like as Peter said to me earlier, You know.

The Doomsday leader had been found guilty and he's now jailed. I mean, he used sensationalist language to create his followers and Trump. It became his greatest ally. And, Formed. His movement against the government and covid, and So it's it's I think language is really important. You know, for people that are You know, when we're so focused on our devices and to find out our information, He'll depends whether it's speaks your language, you know?

And that antios establishment can stuff that. Yeah, it's really effective as many. Like I'm not your average quality. I'm not a sheep. I'm someone better than I'm just like you and that's really. And then you take these language to do that people. She thought sheep full. He's like that.

Yeah, you're right and had actually hasn't implications for how we go onto develop the talk because really it needs to be able to pick up what kind of language we're looking at. To be able to say there's more of a certain language feature than you might expect. Because if each domain is different and you've got news and what should we did that all using a different kind of landfillation, it's going to work at a calculation rights.

Mmm. That's really Here's the this like nuances and the way we speak, you know, we don't always speak perfect English or never, you know, we don't, we don't speak this, you know, back in the olden times. We had a certain way of speaking, but now we're We've got. People using slang.

People using. Their own sort of community ratio. Cultural references. And it will. And it's And it all depends on who you're audiences and what you're right, you know. Yeah. Again, that it goes back to. Who do you want to target with this stuff and use? And he was going to be.

You have most gain by Mr. Needing again. Yeah, here's it. Going to benefit benefit. They made with them being on my side. Yeah.

You. Okay.

Oh yeah. So coming back to the cushions He said the next one we have is do you trust this specific tool to flag language found in misinformation? High trust this tool for the alternative or I wants to version of turnip, I think. And say that again. It looks like I want to version of turn it between.

Okay, yeah, yeah. It's an in. Get into it seems I love it and it's like good or is that bad? That it's a bit like for taking the gram and things? It's very good. Okay, for you if it comes for the news and fact checking and checking for the music information, I don't think it's too reliable to understand a to get better.

Save me. What if I don't know if I myself, don't you? What if I don't know if the English proper Even if it says it the vocabulary for not looks genuine with the grammass are not looking for further, I should know the genuine English or the new metabulary before.

What if I don't know. So if English isn't your language, yeah. Then it comes kind of a bit less useful. Yeah, I hope you. Yes. So your language barriers so you would you as far as the trust but I mean I'll put it here as well but as far as a trust factor, This is something about what it becomes multi-lingual that you would be able to trust it more.

If you breast more, I need more references. Yeah.

I couldn't access the reference of the news. Retired. Yes. Problems, where it came from?

Here.

Is. So say, In future. This tall is nearly perfect body makes any mistakes. It's great new, it's available, it's free. It's on Google. You can edit as a chromebook extension and if therefore, you Would you use it? As a standalone tool or would you also want to use your methods, you know, of verifying, or would you actually think?

Was not talking inside cannot and actually I think nobody will use it as a standalone door. Let me just yeah yeah. Even if you infant that's all the all the works to find the misinformation. I do also personally check with that another sources a water that they think I usually go through protein.

If it was Not super important information like, you know, world a world-changing music just celebrity Gossett or something and it didn't really matter to you. Whether there was true or not, would you still tip verify yourself or you just Maybe just hit all I've seen, its got a bad score on now, take that with a picture.

So, and then just go on and go day or what do you still want to double check? The thing is the people who are looking for the genuine, who will check the mission permission. All don't concentrate much on this kind of ghosts actress pages and kind of things. I think they are more focus on to the actual news.

What's happening? I don't know what what happened for the future. That's what we were focusing on for the news. Do you think most people? Now, don't Important to go and check. Things. What do you think, actually? Most people do do do, don't verify things, you know, is so good.

It is the same if Typically depends on the news. They want are the news they were searching for If, if I have some knowledge about the news field is if the if anything happens for about the immigration immigrants, to the UK that so that will be related to be.

So I will go into the news and where are then verify? Whether it's correct one or a misinfant missing from new source, importantly. Yeah. That's been, I don't think it's a subject that's widely like discussed. You know, I think it's I've got a really can't imagine the everyday person.

To want to use that tour. Unless it's it's And everyday conversations that we are becoming much more aware of misinformation. And because we it's it's only just like on the brink of our attention. It's not to those that To come across these articles. If you. Or in the know.

So the everyday person won't know about this and this it's widely discussed. How would you why would you want to check if we don't really think about this, I want to anyone. Yeah, it's just not like if it's gonna affect them in any personal way then, They probably take it with a Pinterest soul or they believe in it, but it all depends on what their interests are.

You know, so if it's a celebrity gossip, I mean, some people are attracted to that kind of news. And, and they Because entertainment news is big business isn't a absolutely. Yeah. So some people will Probably want to find everything about that person. It's like when you watch your film and you think that accuracus is like amazing, so you find out more about them and what bills they've done?

So you go, you're gonna do your research, aren't you? But with anything like misinformation It's Yeah, the average of the every man. Probably went use the tool Not unless it's more commonly discussed and brought into That's right. Awareness of the top of them. Yeah. Yeah. Because a lot of people are.

You know, we've gotten more A multi health conditions that people are suffering with. And then, You know, if you're Google Some symptoms. You see? Kind of leap into like all the horrible. Yes, you, yeah. You're in the rabbit hole of right? All these horrible things. Sleepy. Yeah, then it get the worst case scenario, don't you Google?

Yeah, yeah. And that's only because it's a personal matter to you. Yeah, so it will depends on how How it relates to you or not. What do you think the best way of raising awareness is, do you think, you know, you actually need to stop early going to schools?

Or you know, is it something that the government should be? Mmm 34. What do you think the best kind of ways that Whoa. Yes, schools for a start because our kids are very impressionable. The peer pressure for them to You know, to be Of interested in pornography, for instance, Yes.

Yeah, that's a massive. Issue that we have. You nothing is, we cannot stop our entry interpret with the misinformation because see, we don't know who create it, who won't create it. So instead of focusing finding the Who missing formation, but we could spread more actual truth. So that's good.

That's a good strategy. So, counter it with the tree. Hmm. Yeah. So, you're not I guess in a way go, how you were only ever be reacting. It's been the most frequent new only, we always react with the most frequent users between the different kinds of papers and journals.

Usually, we don't stick with the particular news in the particular where amusement If you found anything interesting on me important you, if it does matters to meet and I'll start searching, start digging about the topics and let us understand everything. Yeah. Yeah. Us so that that I can access to the different kind of sources in a So I can come conclude with some something which which can be the back.

That's good. We only know how few minutes left. So I'm gonna ask you if you can draw yourself to these last couple of questions looking at What would you want to be different with the tool and what information would you want? In addition to what we already? Behaviour too much, right?

Yeah, it takes Um so yeah, if you can think about it what would you want to see us change? And what more information or new information which you could propose to have or addition to what kind of things.

One thing that could be different is when I click on something in the show, the sentence it would be helpful if they would highlight it on the page because then I could It's kind of freed it again in the context. Yes. Of the building.

Thank you. So, highlight the text that's being assess of the reader can see where it is in the honestyle. And also it can it can give give me the overview of the tool, which it what it gonna work and how it gonna work. Thank you.

What it does and how it works.

Anything about the way that the results are presented to you so much that you would want to be different or we want to know more about. I added person to trust confusing from The President Hitch. Would you like that to be different? And also it will be comfortable with the list of same for that same news.

We can have the list of misinformation published by different kind of sources. It also, if you get to the all misinformation, about the same news, in our own page, that will be more helpful. Go back. That they Sit down a little bit Not just like, oh yeah.

Um, see you mentioned percentages are confusing. So what would your preferred choice be when when you want? The information to be conveyed. I'm not sure.

I don't know, Okay? And it can be any kind of infographics. Contents more into the picture instead of numbers, okay? So officials, yeah, visuals kind of So use pictures. I ponds infographics.

Colour coding help or not. And obviously colours will help.

Students. Just pictures and photographic side. Poems colours.

But it be interesting to. To see whether it can link up to the way the articles been Really interpreted. Up. So then when an article comes out, that's really sort of attention grabbing Than others news sources with their, make their own story about it and see how it's been.

Of reinterpret interpreted in their owns of voice. That's so interesting that you say that Here that Emma Time. So it's like like an article comes out and then it gets picked up by another source and it's reinterpreted which is kind of taking us back to that original project. So we looked at what people thought when they were looking at text about COVID and then how they perceive shoulds must could, and then that how that generates A new set of opinions and views just based on.

Yeah. Yeah. Which is kind of one of the ways tools to be used, is to see child career, how? Yeah, three of the change is. Yeah, exactly. Yeah. You see how it generates a lot of light reactionary. Like responses and where it's picked up. So whether it's by these new sources or by social media influencers, Vloggers blah blah.

You know, all these Possible. So there's hope but this tool will be used. An adapted for a new health communications project so they will look at just that sort of thing. So yeah. Oh another lady, who's running that study? We so happy to hear, you say that it should be.

I'm going to tell her tomorrow. She Yeah, finally people understand how the story gets reinterpreted by reinterpreted. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah, being useful. Right. There's anything else that you want different or new information. You would want to drive? No. Thank you so much. Well, maybe Okay. Like a question there at the end.

Okay. Like how did, how did you find this useful? This tool? Yes. Yes, you know, and what could it? You know. It's just like how we've done it. Yeah. Him. Yeah. Yeah. Because People read. It perceived in their own way. May not be. Saved in the same way as another person.

And so, we all have our own Way of Of reading and understanding. A context and yeah, yeah. And you have our way of checking and we have our own ideas about what we would expect to see. You know in a good answer to all because we've got our own light biases as well, you know.

Yeah we all have our own agendas as well. Yeah you have to be honest. So you will have our own political ideas and things like this and it affects how you reading. I'm sure So put down the feedback questionnaire after using the tools to find out how it was been received and understood.

Here. Popular. Oh well, if there is anything else on that note, thank you so much. You're giving us lots of rich and maybe Thank you. And obviously if anything else comforted You can get in touch with us like hey you know we are we are open to receive like hang on there was another thing.

Up. And another thing. Which is true for the next I think Jeremy's got oh no you've got them. Oh thank you. Thank you. Thank you. That's nice. G appreciated. Thank you exhausting isn't as well. So we're so grateful you've given us of work to do for the next few years.

He just, You want to take with you? And if this cake take piece, okay? Completely. I don't need the calories. Oh,